Red-Teaming in K–12 Threat Assessment: Holding a Mirror to the System, Not Just the Student

In school safety, threat assessment teams spend countless hours evaluating student behavior, identifying concerning patterns, and crafting support plans. But no matter how structured our process may be, there’s a critical question we often overlook:

What if the greatest threat isn’t a student’s behavior, but our own failure to respond effectively to it?

This is the power of Red-Teaming: a practice that challenges not the student, but the system. Not what they did, but what we missed.

What is Red-Teaming?

Red-teaming is a structured method for stress testing decisions, plans, and assumptions. A designated group (often independent from the original decision makers) critically analyzes what could go wrong, before failure occurs.

Rooted in military strategy and now widely used in corporate, intelligence, and cybersecurity fields, red-teaming helps organizations:

Expose hidden vulnerabilities
Break out of groupthink
Strengthen response plans
Prevent catastrophic failure

It’s not second guessing, it’s strategic self reflection.

Where It Comes From and Why It Works

• Military Origins:

Used in war-gaming exercises, red teams were tasked with thinking like the enemy to anticipate attacks and flaws in military operations.

• Business Applications:

Companies like Amazon and Google use red teams to test major product launches, cybersecurity defenses, and crisis communication strategies.

• Intelligence & National Security:

The CIA, DHS, and NSA use red-teaming to simulate how adversaries might bypass security measures or exploit human error.

In each domain, red-teaming has the same mission: reveal the flaws before reality does.

In schools, red-teaming gives us the courage to ask:

“If this threat case fails, what would we regret not doing?”

What is Premortem Analysis?

Premortem analysis is a strategic tool developed by psychologist Gary Klein, a pioneer in decision making under uncertainty. Unlike a postmortem, which examines failure after the fact, a premortem assumes that failure has already occurred and asks the team:

“It’s a year from now, and this plan has failed disastrously. What went wrong?”

This process helps uncover blind spots, groupthink, and overconfidence before harm occurs. In school threat assessment, it shifts the mindset from justifying a plan to stress, testing it, forcing teams to think critically about how a student could still pose a risk despite interventions on paper.

It’s a core component of red-teaming and a powerful tool for improving foresight, accountability, and crisis prevention.

Applying Red-Teaming in K–12 Threat Assessment

Behavioral Threat Assessment and Management (BTAM) in schools is designed to identify risk, support struggling students, and prevent violence. It relies on data, interviews, pattern recognition, and collaboration.

But even strong teams can make mistakes, especially under pressure or when administrative gatekeeping occurs.

Examples of Red-Teaming in Action:

Catching missed warning signs in repeated concerning behavior
Identifying overreliance on counseling without structured monitoring
Challenging an administrator’s resistance to convening a threat team
Noticing that no one verified parent involvement or follow-up
Stress-testing the feasibility of an intervention plan

Red-teaming provides a structured environment to critically evaluate these issues before the consequences unfold.

How Schools and Districts Can Use Red-Teaming

1. Create Red-Team Review Points

For all moderate or high-risk cases, assign a team or individual to conduct a premortem review:

“Assume the plan failed. What went wrong?”

2. Empower Cross Review

Allow regional staff, trained safety coordinators, or district support to review cases from other schools. This adds objectivity and consistency.

3. Train Administrators to Support the Process

Principals and administrators should see red-teaming as a safety enhancement, not a challenge to their authority. Training should emphasize that red-teaming is about protecting students and leadership decisions through due diligence.

4. Use Structured Tools

Develop a toolkit that includes:

A Red-Team Feedback Template
A Premortem Thought Guide
A Plan Failure Trigger Checklist
A Debrief Log for Lessons Learned

5. Normalize Feedback Culture

Threat teams function best when dissent and alternate perspectives are welcomed. This must be part of the team culture, not just a formality.

The Stakes Are Too High to Skip This

Studies of school violence consistently show that warning signs were visible to adults, but processes failed due to:

Leadership resistance
Communication breakdowns
Incomplete documentation
Assumptions that “this student would never do that”
And just flat negligent in doing the work

Red-teaming turns hindsight into foresight.

It allows school teams to say:

“We saw this coming. We talked about it. We fixed it, before it became a headline.”

Red-Teaming is Culture, Not Compliance

Don’t make red-teaming an afterthought or optional step.

Make it:

A regular part of case review
A training scenario in staff PD
A standard protocol for all moderate/high-level cases
A tool for leadership development, not just safety compliance

If we want to build a culture of prevention, we must be willing to ask the hard questions—even about our own performance.

Resources to Build Red-Teaming into Your BTAM Practice

Books & Tools:

“The Red Team Handbook” – U.S. Army TRADOC G-2 (free PDF, foundational theory)
“Red Team: How to Succeed by Thinking Like the Enemy” – Micah Zenko
“Thinking, Fast and Slow” – Daniel Kahneman (understanding cognitive bias)

Organizations & Trainings:

National Threat Assessment Center (NTAC) – U.S. Secret Service
Association of Threat Assessment Professionals (ATAP

💬 Final Thought: Reflection is a Responsibility

Red-teaming is not about perfection. It’s about prevention through humility.

We are entrusted with keeping our students, staff, and communities safe—not just by identifying threats, but by examining our own blind spots, assumptions, and decisions.

In threat assessment, the question isn’t “Did we follow the process?” It’s “Did we do everything we could, honestly, critically, and courageously, to get it right?”

Red-teaming helps ensure the answer is yes.

‍